This book offers the first major study of mock-documentary. The authors examine the relatively new form along with the association between factual codes and. Jane Roscoe and Craig Hight, Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality. Russell Campbell. Uploaded by. Russell Campbell. Campbell, Russell. “Faking It.
|Published (Last):||11 October 2010|
|PDF File Size:||12.84 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.5 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Would you like to tell subvresion about a lower price? Books by Craig Hight. Grace Hill marked it as to-read Mar 04, Read, highlight, and take notes, across web, tablet, and phone. David marked it as to-read Sep 28, Kate rated it liked it Mar 07, Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime.
East Dane Designer Men’s Fashion. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Ships from and sold by Amazon. Manchester University Press Amazon. Examines mock-documentary through the specific relationship which the form has with documentary.
References to this book Staging the Real: X Cookies We would like to place cookies on your computer to improve your viewing experience and help us factualitty this website better. Chapters four, six, seven, and eight set out to establish and then detail a mock-documentary schema based on the three degrees of parody, critique and hoax, and deconstruction. Christopher Taylor added it Mar 04, If you are a seller for this product, would modk-documentary like to suggest updates through seller support?
Hadriyandi Mulyoko added it Oct 25, Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Laura Powell marked it as to-read Dec 09, William Hanff rated it it was amazing Sep 15, Examines mock-documentary through the specific relationship which the form has with documentary.
Mike added it Jun 08, Kilborn Limited preview – Buy Rights to this title. Benn added it Jul 03, Factual discourse and the cultural placing of documentary.
As the authors recognise, there is still a need for more systematic research into audience reception of mock-documentary. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Thomas Reid added it Mar 04, I didn’t learn anything new aside from some examples of films that I may want to watch but most, if not all I could have heard of elsewhere.
Shuangshuang Huo rated it liked it May 19, Jane Jackson added it Mar 04, Recent transformations of the documentary genre. Phillip William rated it did not like it Jun 18, Contents Factual discourse and the cultural placing of documentary.
Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality
Indeed, in setting the context for its development, they provide much that is of value to readers who may not have a specific interest in mock-documentary. Amazon Renewed Refurbished products with a warranty. Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality.
Like Bill Nichols the authors apply a tripartite approach to documentary based on analysis of production, texts and audience consumption, also applying this to their discussion of mock-documentary. Recent transformations of the documentary genre 3.
One of the problems with referring to documentary as a genre is the inherent tendency to generalise and subvefsion homogenise, a danger evident in the otherwise valuable discussion of the conventions of documentary. Part of a wider discussion of the increasingly fragile association between factual codes and conventions and the discourses which underpin the documentary genre.
Jan Czech marked it as to-read Oct 16, In particular I have recommended the first two chapters to students seeking an introduction to contemporary debates in documentary theory. Building a mock-documentary schema 5. There’s a problem fakjng this menu right now.
Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality | Russell Campbell –
A suggested genealogy 6. Customers who bought this item also bought. Amazon Advertising Find, attract, and engage customers.
Mock-docmuentary RoscoeCraig Hight. Opens out this relatively new media form and by doing so throws light on the status of the documentary itself. They begin their argument by establishing what they mean by factual discourse, its assumptions and expectations and the tensions in what they call the genre of documentary.